Adopted by the 60th WMA General Assembly, New Delhi, India, October 2009
Revised by the 72nd WMA General Assembly (online), London, United Kingdom, October 2021,
and reaffirmed with minor revisions by the 230th WMA Council, Porto, Portugal, October 2025

 

WHEREAS,

Documented reports from human rights organisations and concordant testimonies from physicians in the Islamic Republic of Iran have denounced:

  • The lack of essential functioning medical equipment and supplies as well as the deliberate denial of medical care in detention;
  • The widespread use of torture and ill-treatments in detention;
  • Concern about the veracity of documentation related to the death of patients and physicians being forced to produce clinically incorrect documentation;
  • Denial of the rights of hunger strikers;
  • The alarming increase in capital executions, with physicians’ complicity, including for juveniles in violation of children’s rights; and
  • The involvement of physicians in ‘conversion therapies’ for LGBTI people as well as the misuse of psychiatric hospitals against political prisoners and women not wearing the hijab.

 

THEREFORE, the World Medical Association

  1. Refers to the United Nations Nelson Mandela Rules, which emphasizes that the provision of health care for prisoners is a State responsibility, and that the relationship between health-care professionals and prisoners is governed by the same ethical and professional standards as those applicable to patients in the community.
  2. Reaffirms its Declaration of Lisbon on the Rights of the Patient, which states that whenever legislation, government action or any other administration or institution denies patients the right to medical care, physicians should pursue appropriate means to assure or to restore it.
  3. Reaffirms its Declaration of Hamburg Concerning Support for Medical Doctors Refusing to Participate in, or to Condone, the Use of Torture or Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, which encourages doctors to honor their commitment as physicians to serve humanity and to resist any pressure to act contrary to the ethical principles governing their dedication to this task.
  4. Reaffirms its Declaration of Tokyo – Guidelines for Physicians Concerning Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment, which:
  • Prohibits physicians from participating in, or even being present during the practice of torture or other forms of cruel or inhuman or degrading procedures;
  • requires that physicians maintain utmost respect for human life even under threat and prohibits them from using any medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity.
  1. Reaffirms its Resolution on the Responsibility of Physicians in the Documentation and Denunciation of Acts of Torture or Cruel or Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, which states that physicians should attempt to:
  • ensure that detainees or victims of torture or cruelty or mistreatment have access to immediate and independent health care;
  • ensure that physicians include assessment and documentation of symptoms of torture or ill-treatment in the medical records using the necessary procedural safeguards to prevent endangering detainees.
  1. Refers to the WMA International Code of Medical Ethics, which states that physicians shall be dedicated to providing competent medical service in full professional and moral independence, with compassion and respect for human dignity.
  2. Reaffirms its Declaration of Malta on hunger strikerswhich prohibits force-feeding of hunger strikers as “degrading and inhuman,” even when this is the only way to save their lives.
  3. Refers to the WMA Statement on Access of Women and Children to Health Care, which categorically condemns violations of the basic human right of women and children, including violations stemming from social, political, religious, economic and cultural practices.
  4. Refers to the WMA Statement on Natural Variations of Human Sexuality, which condemns all forms of stigmatization, criminalization and discrimination of people based on their sexual orientation.
  5. Urges the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to respect the International Code of Medical Ethics and the standards included in the aforementioned declarations to which physicians are committed.
  6. Stresses that physicians who adhere to the professional and ethical obligations outlined in the entire WMA policy apparatus, including the aforementioned declarations, must be protected.

 

 

Adopted by the 76th WMA General Assembly, Porto, Portugal, October 2025

 

PREAMBLE

The WMA reaffirms the WMA Resolution on the Protection of Healthcare in Israel and Gaza, including the call for immediate and safe release of all hostages.

The World Medical Association (WMA) expresses its profound concern over the attacks on patients, health professionals, medical facilities, and humanitarian aid convoys in Gaza in violations of the Geneva Conventions and applicable international humanitarian law.

Gaza is facing a deepening humanitarian and public health crisis. More than half a million people in Gaza are trapped in famine, marked by widespread starvation, destitution and preventable deaths, according to an Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) analysis. Medical supplies and intervention are vital to treat the effects of malnutrition.

The opportunities for international organisations and actors providing medical humanitarian aid to operate in the region are limited.

It is imperative that all governments, armed forces, and entities in positions of authority strictly adhere to international humanitarian law, including the provisions of the Geneva Conventions, thereby guaranteeing access to humanitarian aid, and that physicians and other health professionals can safely deliver essential care to all individuals in need, particularly within contexts of armed conflict.

Furthermore, physicians must be afforded unimpeded access to patients, medical infrastructure, essential medicines, and critical equipment and must be provided with comprehensive protection to execute their professional duties without hindrance.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. The WMA emphatically calls upon the Government of Israel to:
  • Instantly halt all forms of attacks on healthcare personnel, patients, healthcare facilities, and food and medical aid logistics in accordance with the Geneva Conventions and applicable international humanitarian law.
  • Ensure delivery of humanitarian aid and access to food to all in need.
  • Guarantee respect for the principle of medical neutrality and proceed with the immediate and unconditional release of all health personnel arbitrarily detained.
  • Ensure that health professionals can perform their duties safely, without obstruction or interference.
  • Grant necessary permissions for the unhindered entry and distribution of medical aid and ensure the safe delivery of essential equipment and medicines to healthcare services.
  • Fully honour and adhere to the principles enshrined in the Geneva Conventions and other applicable international humanitarian instruments.
  • Facilitate access for independent investigators and ensure that all individuals responsible for criminal acts are held accountable under international law.
  1. The WMA calls upon its Constituent Members to unequivocally condemn attacks on healthcare personnel and facilities during the ongoing conflict in line with the Geneva Conventions and international humanitarian law.
  2. The WMA calls on the World Health Organization (WHO) to undertake a comprehensive study to determine the full extent of the damage caused to health services, physicians, and other health professionals in Gaza and to identify the measures necessary for their full restoration and compensation.
  3. The WMA urges governments to support peace initiatives and constructive frameworks to bring an end to the hostilities in Gaza and the region.

Adopted by the 54th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, September 2003
Reaffirmed by the 194th WMA Council, Bali, Indonesia, April 2013
and by the 215th WMA Council (online), Cordoba, Spain, October 2020
Reaffirmed with minor revisions by the 230th WMA Council, Porto, Portugal, October 2025

 

Whereas the World Medical Association has a specific focus and function in the field of medical ethics, and came into being on 18 September 1947 during the first General Assembly, it is resolved that its Constituent Members are encouraged to annually observe the 18th September as “Medical Ethics Day”.

 

Adopted by the 74th WMA General Assembly, Kigali, Rwanda, October 2023

PREAMBLE

There are many countries in the world where torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment takes place. However, in some countries, physicians are unable to speak out against human rights violations, even if they witness them, due to the severe repression in the country. It is the WMA’s and the broader medical community’s responsibility to help draw attention to the fundamental changes that are urgently needed in order to guarantee physicians safe and sustainable working conditions, and to allow them to ethically practice their profession. One way of showing this recognition is to refrain from holding international events in such countries.

 

RECOMMENDATION

The WMA calls the medical community worldwide to carefully evaluate the suitability of holding international medical events in countries where physicians are persecuted and, where appropriate, to take a decision on whether to refrain from such events or to provide clear and explicit support for these physicians at such events.

 

Adopted by the 3rd General Assembly of the World Medical Association, London, England, October 1949
Revised by the 22nd World Medical Assembly, Sydney, Australia, August 1968,
the 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983,
the 57th WMA General Assembly, Pilanesberg, South Africa, October 2006
and by the 73rd WMA General Assembly, Berlin, Germany, October 2022

Preamble

The World Medical Association (WMA) has developed the International Code of Medical Ethics as a canon of ethical principles for the members of the medical profession worldwide. In concordance with the WMA Declaration of Geneva: The Physician’s Pledge and the WMA’s entire body of policies, it defines and elucidates the professional duties of physicians towards their patients, other physicians and health professionals, themselves, and society as a whole.

The physician must be aware of applicable national ethical, legal, and regulatory norms and standards, as well as relevant international norms and standards.

Such norms and standards must not reduce the physician’s commitment to the ethical principles set forth in this Code.

The International Code of Medical Ethics should be read as a whole and each of its constituent paragraphs should be applied with consideration of all other relevant paragraphs. Consistent with the mandate of the WMA, the Code is addressed to physicians. The WMA encourages others who are involved in healthcare to adopt these ethical principles.

 

General principles

1. The primary duty of the physician is to promote the health and well-being of individual patients by providing competent, timely, and compassionate care in accordance with good medical practice and professionalism.

The physician also has a responsibility to contribute to the health and well-being of the populations the physician serves and society as a whole, including future generations.

The physician must provide care with the utmost respect for human life and dignity, and for the autonomy and rights of the patient.

2. The physician must practise medicine fairly and justly and provide care based on the patient’s health needs without bias or engaging in discriminatory conduct on the basis of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, culture, sexual orientation, social standing, or any other factor.

3. The physician must strive to use health care resources in a way that optimally benefits the patient, in keeping with fair, just, and prudent stewardship of the shared resources with which the physician is entrusted.

4. The physician must practise with conscience, honesty, integrity, and accountability, while always exercising independent professional judgement and maintaining the highest standards of professional conduct.

5. Physicians must not allow their individual professional judgement to be influenced by the possibility of benefit to themselves or their institution. The physician must recognise and avoid real or potential conflicts of interest. Where such conflicts are unavoidable, they must be declared in advance and properly managed.

6. Physicians must take responsibility for their individual medical decisions and must not alter their sound professional medical judgements on the basis of instructions contrary to medical considerations.

7. When medically appropriate, the physician must collaborate with other physicians and health professionals who are involved in the care of the patient or who are qualified to assess or recommend care options. This communication must respect patient confidentiality and be confined to necessary information.

8. When providing professional certification, the physician must only certify what the physician has personally verified.

9. The physician should provide help in medical emergencies, while considering the physician’s own safety and competence, and the availability of other viable options for care.

10. The physician must never participate in or facilitate acts of torture, or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading practices and punishments.

11. The physician must engage in continuous learning throughout professional life in order to maintain and develop professional knowledge and skills.

12. The physician should strive to practise medicine in ways that are environmentally sustainable with a view to minimising environmental health risks to current and future generations.

Duties to the patient

13. In providing medical care, the physician must respect the dignity, autonomy, and rights of the patient. The physician must respect the patient’s right to freely accept or refuse care in keeping with the patient’s values and preferences.

14. The physician must commit to the primacy of patient health and well-being and must offer care in the patient’s best interests. In doing so, the physician must strive to prevent or minimise harm for the patient and seek a positive balance between the intended benefit to the patient and any potential harm.

15. The physician must respect the patient’s right to be informed in every phase of the care process. The physician must obtain the patient’s voluntary informed consent prior to any medical care provided, ensuring that the patient receives and understands the information needed to make an independent, informed decision about the proposed care. The physician must respect the patient’s decision to withhold or withdraw consent at any time and for any reason.

16. When a patient has substantially limited, underdeveloped, impaired, or fluctuating decision-making capacity, the physician must involve the patient as much as possible in medical decisions. In addition, the physician must work with the patient’s trusted representative, if available, to make decisions in keeping with the patient’s preferences, when those are known or can reasonably be inferred. When the patient’s preferences cannot be determined, the physician must make decisions in the patient’s best interests. All decisions must be made in keeping with the principles set forth in this Code.

17. In emergencies, where the patient is not able to participate in decision making and no representative is readily available, the physician may initiate an intervention without prior informed consent in the best interests of the patient and with respect for the patient’s preferences, where known.

18. If the patient regains decision-making capacity, the physician must obtain informed consent for further intervention.

19. The physician should be considerate of and communicate with others, where available, who are close to the patient, in keeping with the patient’s preferences and best interests and with due regard for patient confidentiality.

20. If any aspect of caring for the patient is beyond the capacity of a physician, the physician must consult with or refer the patient to another appropriately qualified physician or health professional who has the necessary capacity.

21. The physician must ensure accurate and timely medical documentation.

22. The physician must respect the patient’s privacy and confidentiality, even after the patient has died. A physician may disclose confidential information if the patient provides voluntary informed consent or, in exceptional cases, when disclosure is necessary to safeguard a significant and overriding ethical obligation to which all other possible solutions have been exhausted, even when the patient does not or cannot consent to it. This disclosure must be limited to the minimal necessary information, recipients, and duration.

23. If a physician is acting on behalf of or reporting to any third parties with respect to the care of a patient, the physician must inform the patient accordingly at the outset and, where appropriate, during the course of any interactions. The physician must disclose to the patient the nature and extent of those commitments and must obtain consent for the interaction.

24. The physician must refrain from intrusive or otherwise inappropriate advertising and marketing and ensure that all information used by the physician in advertising and marketing is factual and not misleading.

25. The physician must not allow commercial, financial, or other conflicting interests to affect the physician’s professional judgement.

26. When providing medical care remotely, the physician must ensure that this form of communication is medically justifiable and that the necessary medical care is provided. The physician must also inform the patient about the benefits and limitations of receiving medical care remotely, obtain the patient’s consent, and ensure that patient confidentiality is upheld. Wherever medically appropriate, the physician must aim to provide care to the patient through direct, personal contact.

27. The physician must maintain appropriate professional boundaries. The physician must never engage in abusive, exploitative, or other inappropriate relationships or behaviour with a patient and must not engage in a sexual relationship with a current patient.

28. In order to provide care of the highest standards, physicians must attend to their own health, well-being, and abilities. This includes seeking appropriate care to ensure that they are able to practise safely.

29. This Code represents the physician’s ethical duties. However, on some issues there are profound moral dilemmas concerning which physicians and patients may hold deeply considered but conflicting conscientious beliefs.

The physician has an ethical obligation to minimise disruption to patient care. Physician conscientious objection to provision of any lawful medical interventions may only be exercised if the individual patient is not harmed or discriminated against and if the patient’s health is not endangered.

The physician must immediately and respectfully inform the patient of this objection and of the patient’s right to consult another qualified physician and provide sufficient information to enable the patient to initiate such a consultation in a timely manner.

Duties to other physicians, health professionals, students, and other personnel

30. The physician must engage with other physicians, health professionals and other personnel in a respectful and collaborative manner without bias, harassment, or discriminatory conduct. The physician must also ensure that ethical principles are upheld when working in teams.

31. The physician should respect colleagues’ patient-physician relationships and not intervene unless requested by either party or needed to protect the patient from harm. This should not prevent the physician from recommending alternative courses of action considered to be in the patient’s best interests.

32. The physician should report to the appropriate authorities conditions or circumstances which impede the physician or other health professionals from providing care of the highest standards or from upholding the principles of this Code. This includes any form of abuse or violence against physicians and other health personnel, inappropriate working conditions, or other circumstances that produce excessive and sustained levels of stress.

33. The physician must accord due respect to teachers and students.

Duties to society

34. The physician must support fair and equitable provision of health care. This includes addressing inequities in health and care, the determinants of those inequities, as well as violations of the rights of both patients and health professionals.

35. Physicians play an important role in matters relating to health, health education, and health literacy. In fulfilling this responsibility, physicians must be prudent in discussing new discoveries, technologies, or treatments in non-professional, public settings, including social media, and should ensure that their own statements are scientifically accurate and understandable.

Physicians must indicate if their own opinions are contrary to evidence-based scientific information.

36. The physician must support sound medical scientific research in keeping with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki and the WMA Declaration of Taipei.

37. The physician should avoid acting in such a way as to weaken public trust in the medical profession. To maintain that trust, individual physicians must hold themselves and fellow physicians to the highest standards of professional conduct and be prepared to report behaviour that conflicts with the principles of this Code to the appropriate authorities.

38. The physician should share medical knowledge and expertise for the benefit of patients and the advancement of health care, as well as public and global health.

Duties as a member of the medical profession

39. The physician should follow, protect, and promote the ethical principles of this Code. The physician should help prevent national or international ethical, legal, organisational, or regulatory requirements that undermine any of the duties set forth in this Code.

40. The physician should support fellow physicians in upholding the responsibilities set out in this Code and take measures to protect them from undue influence, abuse, exploitation, violence, or oppression.

©2022 World Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. All intellectual property rights in the International Code of Medical Ethics are vested in the World Medical Association.

Croatian translation

Portuguese translation

Adopted by the 68th General Assembly, Chicago, United States, October 2017

 

PREAMBLE

1.      Throughout history, there have been cases of political conflict in which physicians and the professional bodies that represent them have adopted and reinforced the policies of their respective governments in violation of medical ethical standards. There have also been cases of physicians themselves deliberately engaging in criminal activities and embracing unethical ideologies. Even today, on-going moral and political conflicts can lead physicians and their representative organisations to overstep ethical boundaries.

2.      To prevent such breaches of ethical conduct from occurring, physicians and their representative organisations have a responsibility to rise above national conflicts, to foster mutual professional support and to base their actions on the highest medical ethical standards, including the physician’s primary obligation to the health of individual patients.

3.      All national medical associations and their members have an obligation to uphold the ethos of medicine, to demonstrate absolute forthrightness and honesty in confronting historical and ongoing national conflicts, as well as to preserve the lessons gleaned from all forms of unethical behaviour. This includes maintaining a clear commitment to human rights, explicitly rejecting racial, religious, gender, sexual orientation and any other forms of discrimination and actively confronting moral failures of the medical profession.

4.          Physicians have professional and ethical obligations that go beyond ethnic and national interests. Medical associations have a role to play in bridging the gap between different groups based on their common medical ethical codes, regardless of political, religious, ethnic and social background.  Medical expertise as represented in the medical associations could be a powerful agent for re-establishing respect for human rights in general at times of war and other conflicts.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

5.      The World Medical Association urges National Medical Associations to:

5.1       Meet regularly in the spirit of enduring friendship and cooperation;

5.2    Take initiative to invite colleagues from medical associations from nations in conflict to meetings with the intention of re-establishing the contact and cooperation between the associations;

5.3       Engage in a meaningful exchange of experience and knowledge with the regional and global medical community in order to maintain the highest levels of ethical standards and care;

5.4    Ensure that all generations of physicians, including those who have not been involved in any wrongdoing, are made aware of the vital importance of medical ethics and the dire consequences of any departure therefrom. This can be accomplished by including these principles as part of basic medical training (see WMA Resolution on the Inclusion of Medical Ethics and Human Rights in the Curriculum of Medical Schools Worldwide) and continuing throughout physicians’ careers;

5.5    Recognise their obligation to work with each other and with other competent authorities to keep the memory of any deviations from medical ethics or violations of human rights alive, in order to prevent them from happening again;

5.6    Promote the preservation and growth of constructive relations in the medical profession, even in the aftermath of regretful pasts or on-going conflicts. To achieve this, it is particularly important to engage in continuous communication in an atmosphere of professional collegiality.

Adopted by the 68th General Assembly, Chicago, United States, October 2017
and reaffirmed with minor revisions by the 221st WMA Council Session, Berlin, Germany, October 2022

 

PREAMBLE

The WMA Declaration of Tokyo strictly forbids physicians to countenance, condone or participate in the practice of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and requires them to respect the confidentiality of medical information.

The United Nations Principles of Medical Ethics Relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, Particularly Physicians, in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment prohibits health personnel from “participation in, complicity in, incitement to or attempts to commit torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”.

Since 2011, in at least eleven countries, physicians have participated in forced anal examinations of men and transgender women who are charged with consensual same-sex conduct.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has described forced anal examinations as a form of torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment that is “medically worthless” due to the lack of scientific validity of the tests.

Furthermore, in its Statement on Anal Examinations in Cases of Alleged Homosexuality, the Independent Forensic Expert Group, composed of forensic medicine specialists from around the world, has determined that “the examination has no value in detecting abnormalities in anal sphincter tone that can be reliably attributed to consensual anal intercourse”.

The WMA is deeply disturbed by the complicity of physicians in these non-voluntary and unscientific examinations, including the preparation of medical reports that are used in trials to convict men and transgender women of consensual same-sex conduct.

In accordance with its Statement on Body Searches of Prisoners, the WMA reminds that forced examinations are not ethically acceptable and physicians must not perform them.

The ability of persons in custody to provide free and informed consent is limited. Even when consent is given, physicians should refrain from undertaking procedures that are scientifically unfounded, discriminatory and potentially incriminating.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 Recognizing that persons who have undergone forced anal exams have described them as painful, humiliating, and amounting to sexual assault and recalling that physicians should never engage in acts of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, the WMA:

  1. Calls on its Constituent Members, physicians and other health professionals, to stand firmly against participation in forced anal examinations because they are medically invalid;
  2. Urges its Constituent Members to issue written communications prohibiting their members from participating in such examinations;
  3. Urges its Constituent Members to educate physicians and other health professionals about the unscientific and futile nature of forced anal exams and the fact that they are a form of torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment;
  4. Calls on the World Health Organization to make an official statement opposing forced anal examinations to prove same-sex sexual activity as unscientific and unethical in violation of medical ethics.

 

 

 

Adopted by the 206th WMA Council Session, Livingstone, April 2017
and reaffirmed as a Resolution by the 71st WMA General Assembly (online), Cordoba, Spain, October 2020
and rescinded and archived by the 75th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, October 2024

The World Medical Association notes with serious concerns that Dr Serdar Küni, the Human Rights Foundation of Turkey’s representative in Cizre and former president of the Şırnak medical chamber, is still imprisoned after 6 months of detention, on charges that he provided medical treatment to alleged members of Kurdish armed groups.

The case of Dr. Küni is one example amongst many of ongoing arrests, detentions, and dismissals of physicians and other health professionals in Turkey since July 2015, when unrest broke out in the southeast.

The WMA condemns such practices that threaten gravely the safety of physicians and the provision of health-care services. The protection of health professionals is fundamental, so that they can fulfil their duties to provide care for those in need, without regard to any element of identity, affiliation, or political opinion.

The WMA recalls the standards of international human rights law, specifically the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) ratified by Turkey. The Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights guarantees in its article 12 “the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health”. This implies ensuring access to high quality healthcare, supported by a functioning healthcare system and safe conditions for the health workforce.

The WMA recalls as well the standards of international humanitarian law as well as the UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/2286 on Health Care in Armed Conflict that mandates that states should not punish medical personnel for carrying out medical activities compatible with medical ethics, or compel them to undertake actions that contravene these standards.

Furthermore, the WMA reaffirms the principles of medical ethics, including the WMA Regulations in Times of Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence as well as the Ethical Principles of Health Care in Times of Armed Conflict and Other Emergencies endorsed by the ICRC, civilian and military health-care organisations.

The WMA considers that punishing a physician for providing care to a patient constitutes a flagrant breach of international humanitarian and human rights standards as well as medical ethics. Ultimately it contravenes to the principle of humanity that includes the imperative to preserve human dignity.

Thus, in view of the next hearing on 24 April regarding Dr. Küni case at the Şırnak 2nd Heavy Penal Court, the WMA urges national medical associations and the international health community to mobilise in support of the immediate release of Dr. Serdar Küni and the charges based on his medical practice be dropped immediately and unconditionally.

The WMA calls as well national medical associations and the international health community to advocate for:

  • The full respect of Turkey’s humanitarian and human rights obligations, including the right to health, freedom of association and expression as well as the access to a fair trial;
  • The provision of effective remedy and reparation to victims of arbitrary arrests and detentions.

Adopted by the 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington, DC, USA, October 2002, and
revised by the 63rd WMA General Assembly, Bangkok, Thailand, October 2012 and
by the 74th
WMA General Assembly, Kigali, Rwanda, October 2023, and
renamed “Declaration of Kigali” by the 75th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, October 2024

 

PREAMBLE

Medical technology has come to play a key role in modern medicine. It has helped provide significantly more effective means of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of illness, for example through the development and use of information technology, such as telehealth, digital platforms and large-scale data collection and analyses, or the use of advanced machinery and software in areas like medical genetics and radiology, including assistive, artificial, and augmented intelligences.

The importance of technology for medical care will continue to grow and the WMA welcomes this progress. The continuous development of medical technologies – and their use in both clinical and research settings – will create enormous benefits for the medical profession, patients, and society.

However, as for all other activities in the medical profession, the use of medical technology for any purpose, must take place within the framework provided by the basic principles of medical ethics as stated in the WMA Declaration of Geneva: The Physician’s Pledge, the International Code of Medical Ethics and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Respect for human dignity and rights, patient autonomy, beneficence, confidentiality, privacy and fairness must be the key guiding points when medical technology is developed and used for medical purposes.

The rapidly developing use of big data has implications for confidentiality and privacy. Using data in ways which would damage patients’ trust in how health services handle confidential data would be counterproductive. This must be borne in mind when introducing new data driven technology. It is essential to preserve high ethical standards and achieve the right balance between protecting confidentiality and using technology to improve patient care.

Additionally, bias through for example social differences in the collection of data may skew the intended benefits of data driven medical treatment innovations.

As medical technology advances and the potential for commercial involvement grows, it is important to protect professional and clinical independence.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Beneficence

  1. The use of medical technology should have as its primary goal benefit for patients’ health and well-being. Medical technology should be based on sound scientific evidence and appropriate clinical expertise. Foreseeable risks and any increase in costs should be weighed against the anticipated benefits for the individual as well as for society, and medical technology should be tested or applied only if the anticipated benefits justify the risks.

Confidentiality and privacy

  1. Protecting confidentiality and respecting patient privacy are central tenets of medical ethics and must be respected in all uses of medical technology.

Patient autonomy

  1. The use of medical technology must respect patient autonomy, including the right of patients to make informed decisions about their health care and control access to their personal information. Patients must be given the necessary information to evaluate the potential benefits and risks involved, including those generated by the use of medical technology.

Justice

  1. To ensure informed choices and avoid bias or discrimination, the basis and impact of medical technology on medical decisions and patient outcomes should be transparent to patients and physicians. In support of fair and equitable provision of health care, the benefits of medical technology should be available to all patients and prioritized based upon clinical need and not on the ability to pay.

Human rights

  1. Medical technology must never be used to violate human rights, such as use in discriminatory practices, political persecution or violation of privacy.

Professional independence

  1. To guarantee professional and clinical independence, physicians must strive to maintain and update their expertise and skills, i.e., by developing the necessary proficiency with medical technology. Medical curricula for students and trainees as well as continuing education opportunities for physicians must be updated to meet these needs. Physicians shall be included in contributions to research and development. Physicians shall remain the expert during shared decision making and not be replaced by medical technology.
  2. Health care institutions and the medical profession should:
  • help ensure that innovative practices or technologies that are made available to physicians meet the highest standards for scientifically sound design and clinical value;
  • require that physicians who adopt innovations into their practice have relevant knowledge and skills;
  • provide meaningful professional oversight of innovation in patient care;
  • encourage physician-innovators to collect and share information about the resources needed to implement their innovations safely, effectively, and equitably; and
  • assure that medical technologies are applied and maintained appropriately in accordance with their intended purpose.
  1. The relevance of these general principles is stated in detail in several existing WMA policies. Of particular importance are:
  1. The WMA encourages all relevant stakeholders to embody the ethics guidance provided by these documents.

Adopted by the 62nd WMA General Assembly, Montevideo, Uruguay, October 2011,
and reaffirmed with minor revisions by the 218th Council session (online), London, United Kingdom, October 2021 

 

The WMA reaffirms its Declaration of Tokyo establishing guidelines for physicians concerning torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in relation to detention and imprisonment, and recommends that a monitoring and reporting mechanism be established to permit audit of adherence of States to the terms of the said declaration, in particular: 

  1. Where physicians are working in situations of dual loyalties, support must be offered to ensure they are not put in positions that might lead to violations of fundamental professional ethics, whether by active breaches of medical ethics or omission of ethical conduct, and/or of human rights, as laid out in the Declaration of Tokyo. 
  2. Its constituent members should offer support for physicians in difficult situations, including, as feasible and without endangering either patients or doctors, helping individuals to report violations of patients’ health rights and physicians’ professional ethics in custodial settings. The support given must adhere to the principles put forward in the WMA Resolution on the Responsibility of Physicians in the Documentation and Denunciation of Acts of Torture or Cruel or Inhuman or Degrading Treatment. 
  3. The WMA should review the evidence available of the violation of human rights codes by states and/or the forcing of physicians to violate the Declaration of Tokyo and refer as appropriate such cases to the relevant national and international authorities. 
  4. The WMA should encourage its member associations to investigate accusations of physician involvement in torture and similar abuses of human rights reported to it from reputable sources, and to report back in particular on whether physicians are at risk and in need of support.  
  5. The WMA should provide support to its constituent members and their individual physicians members to resist such violations, and as far as realistically possible, stand firm in their ethical convictions. The medical profession and governments should also protect physicians endangered because they adhere to their professional and ethical obligations. 
  6. The WMA shall encourage and support its member associations in their calls for investigations by the relevant United Nations special rapporteur or any other standard and reliable accountability mechanism in place when valid concerns are raised.