{"id":3781,"date":"2017-01-20T12:25:21","date_gmt":"2017-01-20T12:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau.pdf"},"modified":"2017-01-20T12:25:21","modified_gmt":"2017-01-20T12:25:21","slug":"doh_cape_town_2012-_bou__sseau-2","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/doh_cape_town_2012-_bou__sseau-2\/","title":{"rendered":"DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau"},"author":2,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"acf":[],"description":{"rendered":"<p class=\"attachment\"><a href='https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau.pdf'>DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Expert Conference on the Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki<br \/>\n5 \u2013 7 December 2012<br \/>\nCape Town, South Africa<br \/>\nDr Marie-Charlotte Bou\u00ebsseau<br \/>\nEthics and Health<br \/>\nStrengthening ethics review systems<br \/>\nOverview<br \/>\n\u2022 Normative framework<br \/>\n\u2013 Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and<br \/>\nDevelopment \u2013 Financing and coordination<br \/>\n\u2013 UNAIDS\/ WHO guidance document<br \/>\n\u2022 Vulnerable populations<br \/>\n\u2022 Availability of outcomes<br \/>\n\u2022 Strengthening ethics review systems<br \/>\n\u2013 Operational standards \/RECs \u2013 Oversight of RECs<br \/>\n\u2013 Improving transparency in research (ICTRP)<br \/>\ne.g. Pan African Clinical Trials Alliance<br \/>\n\u2022 Building global consensus<br \/>\ne.g. working group of NECs on Biobanking<br \/>\nConsultative Expert Working Group on Research<br \/>\nand Development \u2013 Financing and coordination<br \/>\non Research and Development \u2013 Financing and<br \/>\ncoordination<br \/>\n\u2022 To facilitate equitable access to the benefits of<br \/>\nresearch, suggestions are made to delink the<br \/>\ncosts of R&#038;D and the prices of health products<br \/>\nUNAIDS\/WHO guidance document on Ethical<br \/>\nConsiderations in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials<br \/>\n\u2022 Vulnerable populations (Guidance 8)<br \/>\n\u2013 Multiple vulnerabilities: cultural, social, economical,<br \/>\npolitical<br \/>\n\u2013 Multiple groups: women, children, adolescents, MSM,<br \/>\nPWID (IDU), sex workers, indigenous, poor, etc.<br \/>\nAsses determinant of vulnerability at an early stage<br \/>\nDesign of the protocol should consider incidental risks of<br \/>\nsocial harm and establish measures to prevent them.<br \/>\n\u00ab\u00a0If the risk of exploitation is severe, the research should<br \/>\nnot be conducted.\u00a0\u00bb<br \/>\nUNAIDS\/WHO guidance document on Ethical<br \/>\nConsiderations in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials<br \/>\n\u2022 Availability of outcomes<br \/>\n\u00ab\u00a0Researchers should inform trial participants and their communities<br \/>\nof the trial results. During the initial stages of development of a<br \/>\nbiomedical HIV prevention trial, trial sponsors and countries should<br \/>\nagree on responsibilities and plans to make available as soon as<br \/>\npossible any biomedical HIV preventive intervention demonstrated<br \/>\nto be safe and effective, along with other knowledge and benefits<br \/>\nhelping to strengthen HIV prevention, to all participants in the trials<br \/>\nin which it was tested, as well as to other populations at higher risk<br \/>\nof HIV exposure in the country.\u00a0\u00bb<br \/>\nStrengthening ethics review systems<br \/>\nStandards and Operational Guidance<br \/>\nfor Ethics review of Health related<br \/>\nResearch with Human Participants<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.who.int\/ethics\/publications\/research_standards<br \/>\n_9789241502948\/en\/index.html<br \/>\nIndicators for the oversight of RECs at<br \/>\ncountry level<br \/>\nStrengthening ethics review systems<br \/>\n\u2022 Joint reviews of multicenter trials<br \/>\ne.g. DNDi proposal on African Trypanosomiasis Treatment<br \/>\nAfrican Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF)<br \/>\n\u2022 Recommendations for the implementation of<br \/>\nexisting guidance in specific cases<br \/>\ne.g. placebo controlled vaccine trials<br \/>\nInternational Clinical Trial Registry<br \/>\nPlatform (ICTRP)<br \/>\n\u2022 WHA 2006<br \/>\n\u00ab\u00a0A voluntary platform to link clinical trials registers in order to<br \/>\nensure a single point of access and the unambiguous<br \/>\nidentification of trials with a view to enhancing access to<br \/>\ninformation by patients, families, patient groups and others\u00a0\u00bb<br \/>\n\u2022 Network of 15 WHO data providers<br \/>\n\u2022 More than 220 000 registered<br \/>\nData providers<br \/>\nICTRP (cont.)<br \/>\nA shared responsibility aiming to<br \/>\n\u2022 improve transparency<br \/>\n\u2022 ensure greater accountability<br \/>\n\u2022 prevent unnecessary duplication<br \/>\n\u2022 identify gaps in research<br \/>\n\u2022 prevent publication bias and selective reporting<br \/>\n\u2022 improve trial design<br \/>\n\u2022 improve public trust<br \/>\nFuture perspectives\/ trial registration<br \/>\n\u2022 Include information on ethical approval:<br \/>\n\u2013 RECs<br \/>\n\u2013 Justification for the ethics approval<br \/>\n\u2022 Include information about results of the<br \/>\nresearch<br \/>\nWHO technical support to countries<br \/>\nPan African Clinical trial Alliance<br \/>\n\u2013 RECs and NRAs from 20 Sub Saharan African<br \/>\ncountries (AVAREF)<br \/>\n\u2013 Focus on coordination and harmonization of ethics<br \/>\nreview and approval including clinical trail<br \/>\nregistration<br \/>\n\u2013 Common procedural framework<br \/>\nConsensus building<br \/>\n\u2022 Global Summit of NECs, Working group of on<br \/>\nBiobanking<br \/>\n\u2013 Identification of questions to be addressed<br \/>\n\u2022 Consent<br \/>\n\u2022 Public engagement<br \/>\n\u2022 Role of RECs<br \/>\n\u2022 Harmonization of legal frameworks<br \/>\n\u2022 Governance<br \/>\n\u2022 Benefit sharing<br \/>\n\u2022 etc.<br \/>\n\u2013 Coordination with on going initiatives in other<br \/>\ninternational organizations<br \/>\nConclusion<br \/>\nStrengthening national ethics review systems<br \/>\n\u2013 Ethical norms based on universal principles<br \/>\n(e.g. DoH \u2013 CIOMS \u2013 UNAIDS\/WHO)<br \/>\n\u2013 Strong institutions (RECs)<br \/>\n\u2013 Harmonized procedures (including registration of CT<br \/>\npublication of results, etc.) to ensure good<br \/>\ngovernance: transparency, accountability, equitable<br \/>\naccess to information, participation of all<br \/>\nstakeholders<br \/>\nbouesseaum@who.int<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.who.int\/ethics\/en<\/p>\n"},"caption":{"rendered":"<p>DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau Expert Conference on the Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki 5 \u2013 7 December 2012 Cape Town, South Africa Dr Marie-Charlotte Bou\u00ebsseau Ethics and Health Strengthening ethics review systems Overview \u2022 Normative framework \u2013 Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development \u2013 Financing and coordination \u2013 UNAIDS\/ WHO guidance document \u2022 Vulnerable populations [&hellip;]<\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"","media_type":"file","mime_type":"application\/pdf","media_details":{},"post":null,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/DoH_Cape_Town_2012-_Bou__sseau.pdf","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3781"}]}}