{"id":3226,"date":"2017-01-18T11:01:55","date_gmt":"2017-01-18T11:01:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/EU_CTR_MEPs.pdf"},"modified":"2017-01-18T11:01:55","modified_gmt":"2017-01-18T11:01:55","slug":"eu_ctr_meps-2","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/eu_ctr_meps-2\/","title":{"rendered":"EU_CTR_MEPs"},"author":2,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"acf":[],"description":{"rendered":"<p class=\"attachment\"><a href='https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/EU_CTR_MEPs.pdf'>EU_CTR_MEPs<\/a><\/p>\n<p>THE WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.<br \/>\nL\u2019ASSOCIATION MEDICALE MONDIALE, INC<br \/>\nASOCIACION MEDICA MUNDIAL, INC<br \/>\nCentre International de Bureaux<br \/>\nImmeuble A \u00abKeynes\u00bb Website : www.wma.net Postal Address :<br \/>\n13, chemin du Levant Telephone : (33) 4 50 40 75 75 Bo\u00eete Postale 63<br \/>\n01210 FERNEY-VOLTAIRE Fax : (33) 4 50 40 59 37 01210 FERNEY-VOLTAIRE Cedex<br \/>\nFrance E-mail address : wma@wma.net France<br \/>\nTo the<br \/>\nMembers of the Committees on<br \/>\nEnvironment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI)<br \/>\nInternal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO)<br \/>\nIndustry, Research and Energy (ITRE)<br \/>\nEuropean Parliament<br \/>\nBrussels<br \/>\nBelgium 7th<br \/>\nFebruary 2013<br \/>\nBy e-mail<br \/>\nProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE<br \/>\nCOUNCIL on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive<br \/>\n2001\/20\/EC (COM(2012) 369)<br \/>\nDear Members of Parliament,<br \/>\nWe would like to take the opportunity to raise serious concerns regarding the European<br \/>\nCommission proposal COM(2012) 369 and the upcoming first draft committee report by<br \/>\nGlenis Willmott, MEP:<br \/>\nThe European Commission proposal COM(2012) 369 seeks to make fundamental revisions to the<br \/>\nClinical Trials Directive 2001\/20\/EC. The Clinical Trials Directive 2001\/20\/EC is based on and<br \/>\nsupplemented by a set of internationally recognized scientific quality standards in the interest of the<br \/>\nsafety, reliability and ethical acceptability of clinical research involving human subjects.<br \/>\nFurthermore, it builds on the set of ethical principles and internationally recognized protection<br \/>\nstandards as embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association (WMA).<br \/>\nThe current proposal by the European Commission fails to uphold these basic tenets and disrespects<br \/>\ncentral ethical principles as embodied in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. WMA considers such<br \/>\nan approach unacceptable primarily for the following reasons:<br \/>\nWMA page 2<br \/>\n1. The WMA Declaration of Helsinki inter alia requires the prior approval of clinical research<br \/>\ntrials by independent ethics committees1<br \/>\n. The proposal does not include an explicit referral<br \/>\nto such a requirement. The European Commission assumes that it is sufficient to leave the<br \/>\ndetermination of the responsible bodies up to the discretion of the Member States. In view of<br \/>\nrecital (50) which reads the \u201cCommission should be able to control whether Member States<br \/>\ncorrectly supervise compliance with this Regulation. Moreover, the Commission should be<br \/>\nable to control whether regulatory systems of third countries ensure compliance with the<br \/>\nspecific provisions of this Regulation and Directive 2001\/83\/EC concerning clinical trials<br \/>\nconducted in third countries,\u201c Without the explicit requirement of ethics committees such<br \/>\nsafeguards cannot be subject to any control, either by any Member State or by the<br \/>\nCommission.<br \/>\nThus, the proposal undermines the protection of research subjects and researchers and the<br \/>\nscientific quality and trust in clinical research that ethics committees have helped to<br \/>\nguarantee, not only in the European Union but also in non-EU countries. With its explicit<br \/>\nprovisions for the establishment and operation of ethics committees, the Clinical Trials<br \/>\nDirective 2001\/20\/EC has made a significant contribution to ensuring that independent<br \/>\nethics committees could be established in accordance with international ethical standards to<br \/>\nprotect the rights, safety and well-being of clinical trial subjects, even in countries where this<br \/>\npreviously was not the case. To waive the explicit requirement for independent ethics<br \/>\ncommittees weakens this protection of research subjects in non-EU countries and in several<br \/>\nMember States.<br \/>\n2. The proposed regulation stipulates the requirement of a \u201ctherapeutic benefit\u201d (see Art. 28<br \/>\npara. 1 a). This requirement is a misconception about research since a therapeutic benefit<br \/>\ncan hardly ever be guaranteed. The Declaration of Helsinki covers all medical research in<br \/>\nhumans. The fact that the regulation refers only to clinical trials does not change the need<br \/>\nfor a respect for ethical principles.<br \/>\n3. The proposed regulation stipulates unreasonably short timelines for Member States to assess<br \/>\nand review applications. Shortening the time for careful consideration before approval of<br \/>\nresearch trials risks missing defects in protocols and puts research subjects in danger.<br \/>\n4. The proposed regulation provides that the decision of the reporting Member State as to<br \/>\nwhether the conduct of a clinical trial is acceptable and is generally binding for all other<br \/>\nMember States concerned. Disagreement of the Member States concerned about the<br \/>\nconclusion of the reporting Member State is permissible only under very narrow provisions<br \/>\nand cannot be based on grounds of their own different assessment of the question of<br \/>\nacceptability. Such an approach may lead to sponsors of clinical trials seeking locales for<br \/>\napproval of their protocols in places with less rigorous requirements (ethics shopping). And<br \/>\nworse, it may force Member States to grant or accept market authorization based on<br \/>\nethically or scientifically unacceptable trials.<br \/>\n1<br \/>\nArticle 15 of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki states that: \u201cThe research protocol must be submitted for consideration, comment,<br \/>\nguidance and approval to a research ethics committee before the study begins. This committee must be independent of the researcher,<br \/>\nthe sponsor and any other undue influence. It must take into consideration the laws and regulations of the country or countries in which<br \/>\nthe research is to be performed as well as applicable international norms and standards but these must not be allowed to reduce or<br \/>\neliminate any of the protections for research subjects set forth in this Declaration. The committee must have the right to monitor ongoing<br \/>\nstudies. The researcher must provide monitoring information to the committee, especially information about any serious adverse events.<br \/>\nNo change to the protocol may be made without consideration and approval by the committee.\u201d<br \/>\nWMA page 3<br \/>\nFor these reasons the WMA is deeply concerned that the current draft regulation leads to a<br \/>\nsignificant paradigm shift that risks putting economic interests before ethics. In addition, in view of<br \/>\nthe scope of this regulation, applying as it does to Member States and also to third countries, its<br \/>\neffects might be unpredictable and detrimental for research, the development of safe and ethically<br \/>\ndeveloped medicine, and most importantly, dangerous for research subjects and patients in Europe<br \/>\nand elsewhere.<br \/>\nWe urge you to revise the current proposal and stand ready to discuss this further with the<br \/>\nappropriate personnel to achieve an optimal outcome for the people for whom we care.<br \/>\nSincerely,<br \/>\nCecil B. Wilson, MD, MACP Dr. Mukesh C. Haikerwal AO<br \/>\nPresident Chairman of Council<br \/>\nThe World Medical Association (WMA) is the global federation of National Medical Associations<br \/>\nrepresenting the millions of physicians worldwide. Acting on behalf of patients and physicians, the<br \/>\nWMA endeavors to achieve the highest possible standards of medical care, ethics, education and<br \/>\nhealth-related human rights for all people.<\/p>\n"},"caption":{"rendered":"<p>EU_CTR_MEPs THE WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. L\u2019ASSOCIATION MEDICALE MONDIALE, INC ASOCIACION MEDICA MUNDIAL, INC Centre International de Bureaux Immeuble A \u00abKeynes\u00bb Website : www.wma.net Postal Address : 13, chemin du Levant Telephone : (33) 4 50 40 75 75 Bo\u00eete Postale 63 01210 FERNEY-VOLTAIRE Fax : (33) 4 50 40 59 37 01210 FERNEY-VOLTAIRE Cedex [&hellip;]<\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"","media_type":"file","mime_type":"application\/pdf","media_details":{},"post":null,"source_url":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/EU_CTR_MEPs.pdf","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3226"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wma.net\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3226"}]}}