|
WMA regrets Maltese Government's decision to delay no smoking
ban
The President of the World Medical Association has regretted
the decision by the Government of Malta to postpone the introduction
of a ban on smoking in public places.
Speaking today at a meeting of the Medical Association of Malta
- the day when the ban was due to be introduced - Dr James Appleyard
said that eighty per cent of the Maltese people agreed with such
a ban and the Government should not be diverted from its task
by the self serving lobbying of the tobacco manufacturers and
related services industries.
'I congratulate the Maltese Government on its commitment to smoke
free public places, but I regret its decision to delay the ban',
said Dr Appleyard. 'By introducing such a ban, it would be setting
an example for Britain to follow. Already Ireland, Finland, S
Africa, Thailand, Canada, Australia and the US have introduced
similar laws.
'Governments throughout the world should introduce firm measures
to ban tobacco smoke in public places and work places in the interest
of the health and economic wellbeing of their citizens. Tobacco
smoke is the only substance known to cause cancer that is not
regulated in the workplace.
'Tobacco smoke contains more than fifty toxic substances known
to cause cancer. In addition, it includes carbon monoxide, hydrogen
cyanide, arsenic and ammonia.
'The vast majority - eighty five per cent - of "second hand"
smoke is invisible and odourless. The constituents or their derivatives
can be detected in hair, blood, saliva and urine. There is no
safe level below which no adverse effects are seen. Conventional
ventilation systems and air cleaning systems are expensive and
do not provide effective protection. Because only the visible
particulate matter, and not the harmful gases, is filtered, a
false impression of safety is given.'
Dr Appleyard said that in the United States, a large study showed
that, while nearly half of non smokers claimed not to have been
exposed to second hand smoke, their blood contained metabolites
of nicotine from cigarettes.
The health hazards of passive smoking were well known. In adults
there was conclusive evidence that passive smoking caused lung
cancer, coronary heart disease and exacerbated asthma attacks.
There was also substantial evidence that it caused strokes.
One study had found that among non smokers married to a smoker,
the risk of stroke was doubled.
In children, there was conclusive evidence that passive smoking
caused cot death, ear and respiratory infections and was likely
to be associated with premature births and low birth weight infants
Dr Appleyard added: 'For the tobacco manufacturers and the related
service industries to promote an unsafe environment causing such
a burden of disease on an unwilling population amounts to nothing
short of self serving and cynical exploitation
'Smoking in the workplace is of great concern. Workers in restaurants
are exposed to cigarette smoke about twice that of office workers
and bar workers up to six times. The economic costs to the employer
come from increased time off work through illness and reduced
productivity. Employers also have to bear the indirect costs of
higher maintenance, cleaning cots, greater risk of fire damage,
explosion and accidents, and higher fire insurance premiums.
'The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control recognizes that second hand cigarette smoke is a health
hazard and commits governments to take appropriate action for
the protection of non smokers.
'The Maltese Government should not delay in responding to the
wishes of the Maltese people to ban smoking in public places -
to protect their health and the health of their children; to save
money by preventing the burden of long term disease and to make
Malta the healthiest island in the Mediterranean where holidaymakers
can come for fun, rest and recreation in a safe environment.'
|