|
Adopted by the 50th World Medical Assembly
Ottawa, Canada, October 1998
Preamble
- In October 1990, the World Medical Association (WMA) adopted
a WMA Declaration on Chemical and Biological Weapons (17.Y)
in which it condemned, and asked all governments to refrain
from, the development and use of these weapons, and urged National
Medical Associations to join the WMA in actively supporting
the Declaration. In this Declaration the WMA acknowledged the
dangers and health hazards of the use of these weapons, including
the indiscriminate and long lasting effects on civilian populations
and on the environment, and argued that existing health care
services, technology and manpower may be helpless to relieve
the suffering caused by the weapons.
- The effects of nuclear weapons may be even more catastrophic,
more indiscriminate, and longer lasting than chemical and biological
weapons. These effects, based on studies of affected populations
and on studies of the consequences of radioactive fallout from
nuclear test explosions in the atmosphere, have been widely
documented over the years.
- At least 40% of the population of Hiroshima and 26% of the
population of Nagasaki were killed in the nuclear attacks on
these two cities. Modern nuclear weapons are much more destructive,
and the casualties today would be much higher.
- Apart from the immediately lethal effects of blast, heat
and radiation, many of the survivors would perish from the latent
effects of ionising radiation (leukaemia, cancer, and genetic
effects) as well as the infectious diseases like cholera, tuberculosis
and dysentery arising from the breakdown in local services.
- Sunlight-absorbing particulate matter generated by fires
following a massive nuclear attack involving many weapons exploding
at many different sites would reduce the penetration of sunlight
to the earth's surface and change the physical properties of
the earth's atmosphere, leading to prolonged periods of darkness
and devastating effects on agricultural production.
- The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed many health
professionals, destroyed all hospitals and infrastructure, such
as electricity and water supply, and made it impossible for
medical services to function at a time when they were most needed.
- The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its recent advisory
opinion on the legal status of nuclear weapons, declared that
the threat or use of nuclear weapons is contrary to the United
Nations Charter and to the rules of international law applicable
in armed conflict, and in particular to the principles and rules
of humanitarian law.
- The ICJ, in view of the current state of international law,
however, could not conclude definitively whether the threat
or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an
extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival
of a State would be at stake.
- The WMA Declarations of Geneva (17.A), of Helsinki (17.C)
and of Tokyo (17.F) make clear the duties, responsibilities
and sacred mission of the medical profession to preserve and
safeguard the health of the patient and to consecrate itself
to the service of humanity.
Recommendations
- The WMA considers that, with its unique position of influence
in society, it has a duty to work for the elimination of nuclear
weapons. Therefore the WMA:
- condemns the development, testing, production, deployment,
threat and use of nuclear weapons;
- requests all governments to refrain from the development,
testing, production, deployment, threat and use of nuclear
weapons and to work in good faith towards the elimination
of nuclear weapons; and
- requests all National Medical Associations to join the
WMA in supporting this Declaration and to urge their respective
governments to work towards the elimination of nuclear weapons.
|