|
Initiated: October 2000 SMAC/Databases/Oct2002
Adopted by the WMA General Assembly, Washington 2002
- The right to privacy entitles people to exercise control over
the use and disclosure of information about them as individuals.
The privacy of a patient's personal health information is secured
by the physician's duty of confidentiality.
- Confidentiality is at the heart of medical practice and is
essential for maintaining trust and integrity in the patient-physician
relationship. Knowing that their privacy will be respected gives
patients the freedom to share sensitive personal information
with their physician.
- These principles have been incorporated in WMA statements
since the WMA was founded in 1947, in particular by:
- The Declaration of Lisbon, that states: "The patient's
dignity and right to privacy shall be respected at all times
in medical care and teaching";
- The Declaration of Geneva, that requires physicians to
"preserve absolute confidentiality on all he knows
about his patient even after the patient has died";
- The Declaration of Helsinki, that states:
"It is the duty of the physician in medical research to
protect the life, health, privacy, and dignity of the human subject"
"Every precaution should be taken to respect the privacy
of the [research] subject, the confidentiality of the patient's
information and to minimize the impact of the study on the subject's
physical and mental integrity and on the personality of the subject"
"In any research on human beings, each potential subject
must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of funding,
any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations
of the researcher, the anticipated benefits and potential risks
of the study and the discomfort it may entail. The subject should
be informed of the right to abstain from participation in the
study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time without
reprisal. After ensuring that the subject has understood the information,
the physician should then obtain the subject's freely-given informed
consent, preferably in writing"
- The primary purpose of collecting personal health information
is the provision of care to the patient. Increasingly, this
information is held in databases. The database might hold the
patient's health record or specific information from it, for
example in the case of disease registries.
- Progress in medicine and in health care is contingent upon
the conduct of quality assurance and risk management activities
and health and medical research, including retrospective epidemiological
studies, which use information concerning the health of individuals,
communities and societies. Databases are valuable sources of
information for these secondary uses of health information.
- Care must be taken to ensure that secondary uses of information
do not inhibit patients from confiding information for their
own health care needs, exploit their vulnerability or inappropriately
borrow on the trust that patients invest in their physicians.
- For the purpose of this statement, the following definitions
are used:
- 'Personal health information' is all information recorded
with regard to the physical or mental health of an identifiable
individual;
- A 'database' is a system to collect, describe, save, recover
and/or use personal health information from more than one
individual whether by manual or electronic means. This definition
does not include information in the clinical record of any
individual patient;
- 'De-identified data' are data in which the link between
the patient and the information has been broken and cannot
be recovered;
- 'Consent' is a person's voluntarily given permission for
an action, based on a sound understanding of what the action
involves and its likely consequences. In some jurisdictions,
the law allows substituted consent to be given on behalf
of minors, on behalf of adults who do not have the capacity
to consent for themselves, or on behalf of deceased persons.
PRINCIPLES
- These principles apply to all new and existing health databases,
including those run or managed by commercial organisations.
Access to information by patients
- Patients have the right to know what information physicians
hold about them, including information held on health databases.
In many jurisdictions, they have a right to a copy of their
health records.
- Patients should have the right to decide that their personal
health information in a database (as defined in 7.2) be deleted.
- In rare, limited circumstances, information may be withhold
from a patient if it is likely that disclosure cause serious
harm to the patient or another person. Physicians must be able
to justify any decision to withhold information from a patient.
Confidentiality
- All physicians are individually responsible and accountable
for the confidentiality of the personal health information they
hold. Physicians must also be satisfied that there are appropriate
arrangements for the security of personal health information
when it is stored, sent or received, including electronically.
- In addition, medically qualified person(s) should be appointed
to act as guardian of a health database, to have responsibility
for monitoring and ensuring compliance with the principles of
confidentiality and security.
- Safeguards must be in place to ensure that there is no inappropriate
or unauthorised use of or access to personal health information
in databases, and to ensure the authenticity of the data. When
data is transmitted, there must be arrangements in place to
ensure that the transmission is secure.
- Audit systems must keep a record of who has accessed personal
health information and when. Patients should be able to review
the audit record for their own information.
Patients' consent
- Patients should be informed if their health information is
to be stored on a database and of the purposes for which their
information may be used.
- Patients' consent is needed if the inclusion of their information
on a database involves disclosure to a third party or would
permit access by people other than those involved in the patients'
care, unless there are exceptional circumstances as described
in paragraph 11.
- Under certain conditions, personal health information may
be included on a database without consent, for example where
this conforms with applicable national law that conforms to
the requirements of this statement, or where ethical approval
has been given by a specially appointed ethical review committee.
In these exceptional cases, patients should be informed about
the potential uses of their information, even if they have no
right to object.
- If patients object to their information being passed to others,
their objections must be respected unless exceptional circumstances
apply, for example where this is required by applicable national
law that conforms to the requirements of this statement or necessary
to prevent a risk of death or serious harm.
- Authorization from the guardian of the health database is
needed before information held on databases may be accessed
by third parties. Procedures for granting authorization must
comply with recognised codes of confidentiality.
- Approval from a specially appointed ethical review committee
must be obtained for all research using patient data, including
for new research not envisaged at the time the data were collected.
An important consideration for the committee in such cases will
be whether patients should be contacted to obtain consent, or
whether it is acceptable to use the information for the new
purpose without returning to the patient for further consent.
The committee's decisions must be in accordance with applicable
national law and conform to the requirements of this statement.
- Data accessed must be used only for the purposes for which
authorization has been given.
- People who collect, use, disclose or access health information
must be subject to an enforceable duty to keep the information
secure.
De-identified data
- Wherever possible, data for secondary purposes should be
de-identified. If this is not possible, however, the use of
data where the patient's identity is protected by an alias or
code should be used in preference to readily identifiable data.
- The use of de-identified data does not usually raise issues
of confidentiality. Data about people as individuals, in which
they retain a legitimate interest, for example a case history
or photograph, require protection.
Data integrity
- Physicians are responsible for ensuring, as far as practicable,
that the information they provide to, and hold on, databases
is accurate and up-to-date.
- Patients who have seen their information and believe there
are inaccuracies in it have the right to suggest amendments
and to have their comments appended to the information.
Documentation
- There must be documentation to explain: what information
is held and why; what consent has been obtained from the patients;
who may access the data; why, how and when the data may be linked
to other information; and the circumstances in which data may
be made available to third parties.
- Information to patients about a specific database should
cover: consent to the storage and use of data; rights of access
to the data; and rights to have inaccurate data amended.
Management
- Procedures for addressing enquiries and complaints must be
in place.
- The person or persons who are accountable for policies, procedures,
and to whom complaints or enquiries can be made must be identified.
Policies
- National medical associations should co-operate with the
relevant health authorities, ethical authorities and personal
data authorities, at national and other appropriate administrative
levels, to formulate health information policies based on the
principles in this document.
6.10.2002
|