|
Dominican Medical and Dental Society - Scientific Conference
 |
Jaragua Hotel |
 |
San Domingo |
 |
Dominican Republic |
 |
16th July 2004 |
 |
Keynote Address |
 |
Dr. James Appleyard - President of the World Medical Association
|
How does the world treat our children?
Violence and Child Health
Violence is a leading public health problem. As a profession,
we need to have a fundamental re-think on the role we physicians
can play both to mitigate the effects of the current epidemic
of violence and to develop strategies to prevent violence in the
longer term.
The World Medical Association was founded in 1947 after the turbulence
terror and torture of World War II to unite physicians worldwide
in a shared mission founded on traditional Hippocratic principles.
These have been enshrined in the Declaration of Geneva, which
commits members of the profession to "consecrate their lives
in the service of humanity" and to the precept that the health
of each patient is their first consideration. Further work on
repairing the damage of some doctors' conduct during that War
was undertaken to establish the Declaration of Helsinki, which
defines the ethical principles underlying clinical research. And
later, after wide consultation, the Declaration of Tokyo was forged
this states that doctors shall not "countenance, condone
or participate in the practice of torture or other forms of cruel,
inhuman or degrading procedures". More recently, the Declaration
of Ottawa on the Right of a Child to Health Care encouraged physicians
to "eradicate all forms of child abuse''.
After the end of the "Cold War", a "peace dividend"
never materialized. Expenditure of arms decreased in the early
1990s but the savings were not allocated to children's needs.
A decade of ethnic conflict and civil wars ensued, characterized
by deliberate violence against children on a vast scale.
Children have become targets as well as perpetrators of violence,
perpetuating the cycle of violence into the next generation. During
these conflicts, children have been maimed, killed, uprooted from
their homes, orphaned, exploited and sexually abused. They have
been abducted and recruited as soldiers. During conflicts, a country's
food production is compromised, malnutrition ensures with a life-long
effect, with the disintegration of the local "infrastructure".
Health services disappear and mortality rates rise. These are
clearly reflected in UNICEF "league tables" of under
-5 mortality rates per 1 000 live births. Those countries riven
by conflict and thrown into poverty have the highest rates of
childhood mortality, an enormous sacrifice that those countries
cannot afford to bear.
An estimated 300,000 children are actively involved in armed conflicts.
AIDS follows in the wake of such conflict, leaving large numbers
of orphans and by killing teachers, health workers and public
servants undermines the stability of the country. Immunization
programmes disintegrate. Thus, Angola has the highest polio infection
rate in all of Africa and the Democratic Republic of the Congo
has had a ten-fold increase in polio since 1999. These factors
leave a further burden of disability and death for the poorer
countries to bear.
The epidemic of violence perpetuates poverty, giving a further
twist to the vicious cycle of poverty, poor health and death to
more poverty, more ill-health and more deaths. Violence becomes
endemic in communities and is continued in such institutionalized
cultural practices as female genital mutilation, which affects
2 million children and women worldwide. Rape and domestic violence
cause 5% loss of healthy life- years. "The 20th century was
one of the most violent periods in human history. An estimated
191 million people lost their lives directly or indirectly as
a result of armed conflict and well over half were civilians"
(Rummel R J 1994).
The risk factors are well known :
- Lack of the democratic process and denial of the rights of
the individual
- Social inequity with unequal access to wealth and health
- Control of natural resources by a single group
- Rapid demographic change (Carnegie Commission).
To prevent violence, nations must
- reduce poverty and ensure developmental assistance in the
form of social and health care that reaches those who need it
- reduce inequity
- reduce access to arms
- abide by international treaties.
Physicians are very much involved in the first action and by
their example can encourage others to seek to achieve the other
three.
The costs of violence have been calculated in Latin America.
It costs Colombia and El Salvador 25% of their gross national
budgets, Brazil and Venezuela about 11%, and Mexico 1.3%.
If those countries are to emerge from poverty, their internal
conflicts must cease through the example of their neighbours.
We can do more to undo the harm of terror and torture which are
the hallmarks of an oppressive regime by exposing the practice
of torture. Physicians are in a dangerous but crucial position
to identify the victims, and document their injuries so that the
perpetrators can be brought to justice.
It is a gradual process. Torture is undertaken in intense secrecy
though it instills fear from the knowledge that it is taking place.
Once brought to the light of day with the naming and shaming of
the perpetrators, the will of the people will prevail. That is
why the WMA is partnering the International Council for the Rehabilitation
of Torture Victims in pilot projects in five countries to promote
the Istanbul Protocol which provides guidance on the identification
of the injuries of torture victims so that they can be documented
and the perpetrators brought to justice.
In my view, as a profession we need to do more. We must also
tackle the root causes of child abuse, instill in societies non-
violent means of resolving disputes, and we must start in childhood.
The chastisement of children promotes a culture of violence, this
is exacerbated by the more severe forms of child abuse. Idi Amin
was a prime example of how devastating the long- term consequences
can be.
I smacked my own children on a very few occasions. Each time,
it was a failure by me as their father to manage an annoying provocative
act. No one can be perfect but we can change our way of thinking
and learn nurturing ways of bringing up our children. The case
against chastising children is overwhelming. Under UK law, reasonable
chastisement is allowed. Not to allow chastisement is more reasonable.
And is more readily defined. Like the introduction of seat belts
in the UK, change of behaviour comes over time even though the
law is changed. The important message is that the community agrees
that it does not condone violence towards children or adults.
In this way, communities and the world will be a much safer place
for their children and the future of the world.
|